Pakistan India Relations
I will start
my discussion by quoting the saying:
“Only the dead can see the end of the war”-Plato
“Only the dead can see the end of the war”-Plato
These
remarks echoed the history of his time when the occurrence of war is too often.
At that time the Throne belongs to the mighty ones. The state having more power
might rule the other states. This leads to the theory of realism in which
states constantly ensures that they have enough power to defend themselves and
advance their material interests necessary for their survival.
REALISM:
Coming
towards India-Pakistan relations, both the states are realists so far as they
are born rivals. Both of the states fear each other’s invasion. Realists claim
that survival is the principal goal of every state and foreign invasion is the
most pressing threat that a state could face. Balance of power between the
rivals is the main thought behind realism.
Both India
and Pakistan are spending huge part of their whole budget on their defense.
Pakistan is spending $4 billion while India is spending about $36 billion on
their defense rather than on their people just because the fear of invasion.
Realist thought that gaining power is the only solution for avoiding invasions
and both India and Pakistan are doing the same , the only focus of both the
countries is to gain power by one means or the other.
India tests
its first nuclear weapon on May 18 1974 to show his power over Pakistan, after
that Pakistan main focus was becoming a nuclear power because India as a
nuclear power seems a threat to Pakistan, So on May 28 1998 Pakistan also
launches its first nuclear weapon test at Chaghi-1.
Realists are of two types:
- · Defensive realists
- · Offensive realists
As far as
Pakistan and India is concerned both countries are both offensive and defensive
at the same time as per their policy.
The main
tenants of offensive realists are:
·
Great
powers are the main actors in world politics.
·
All
states have some military capability.
·
Survival
is their primary goal.
Pakistan and
India are offensive realists in the sense that in order to ensure their survival
they will seek to maximize their power to threaten each other. This theory also
says that if the rival countries possess enough power, to threaten them it can
never be safe. So both countries are seeking power to nullify the power one
another.
On the other
hand India and Pakistan are also act as the defensive realists as defensive
realists though that War or Domination over other states is an unwise decision
for state survival, they thought that this might lead their nation towards a
dangerous conflict. Defensive realists believe in balance of power, where
states have equal distribution of power to ensure that none will risk attacking
another. Now war is not an option between India and Pakistan because both the
countries possess nuclear warheads none of them want to be attacked by a
nuclear weapon as this will lead towards total mass destruction.
Solution/Conclusion/Result:
India and
Pakistan had faced two major wars 65’ and 71’ none of which prove good to each
other but the destruction of their economy and the nation as well. Peace is the
only solution to this problem, the resolution of some specific disputes did not
lead to peace, and new disputes would arise in place of previous resolved ones.
Indus river dispute is one of the main disputes among India and Pakistan at
early stages and was resolved in 1960’s and many other disputes were resolved
but none of them had any lasting impact on India Pakistan relations. By the
early 90’s Kashmir dispute arises as the most important dispute between the two
countries that has not been resolved till now. This suggests that specific
disputes are only symptoms of deeper conflict between India and Pakistan. Many
of the scholars think that political realism is convincing approach between
rivals. Once France and UK are the bloody enmity and now have united under one
flag, Likewise France and Germany fought brutal wars but now enjoy friendly relations
under EU flag. In my point of view Pakistan and India should learn a lesson
from china as china also has border dispute with china and most of the
countries. China claims on Taiwan but never thought of physical interference
despite of the fact that china is more powerful than Taiwan. Pakistan must
focus on its economy. India must also should not dictate to other countries of
south Asia. Our leaders of world political chess-board should believe in on the
famous maxim
“There are no permanent
friends or enemies in international politics but only permanent interests”.
Our priority
should be rapid economic development as china has done, to raise the standard
of living of our people. Today power belongs to the one having strong economy
rather than having strong defense, Defense counts but now there is the era of
economy. We should amend our past policies of allocating all the nation’s
resources on defense and must concentrate on the economic development of our
nation .
No comments:
Post a Comment